Nov 2020 Q4 a.
The Auditor- General of Ghana has unfettered power and not subject to the control of any other authority in the discharge of his duties. He therefore refuses to accept any directives from cabinet ministers.
Required:
Evaluate the extent to which it can be said that the Auditor-General is not subject to direction of any other authority. (10 marks)
View Solution
The office of the Auditor General is enshrined in the 1992 constitution of Ghana. He is appointed by the President on the advice of the Council of State. (2 mark)
The Auditor General is the head of the Ghana Audit Service which is the supreme audit institution of Ghana. He is a part of the Audit Service Board, which is responsible for:
- Determining the terms and condition of service of employees in the Ghana Audit Service. (1 mark)
- Making regulations for the effective and efficient administration of the Ghana Audit Service. (1 mark)
In the performance of his duties the constitution gives the Auditor General the right of access to all books, records, returns and other documents relating to or relevant to those accounts. (1 mark)
The constitution provides in article 187(7) that in the performance of his functions under the constitution or any other law the Auditor General shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other person or authority. (1 mark)
However in clause 8 of article 187 it is provided that paragraph (a) of clause (7) of article 187 shall not preclude the president acting in accordance with the advice of the Council of State, from requesting the Auditor General, in the public interest to audit at any particular time, the accounts of any such organisation in respect of the public accounts of Ghana. (2 marks)
From the foregoing it is clear that it is the president acting on the advice of the Council of State that can direct the Auditor General to audit any public account in the public interest. Therefore a cabinet minister cannot issue any directive to the Auditor General. However if the cabinet minister is acting on the instructions of the president, it would appear as if the instructions is coming from the president and should be carried out. This may be subject to interpretation by the Supreme Court. (2 marks)