b) The management of Akolo Ltd (Akolo) has been running this business entity for some time now. At a seminar organized for some select businesses at the Trade Fair-Accra last year, the management of Abolo Ltd (Abolo) realized at the seminar that the two companies (Akolo and Abolo) have a lot in common with the same market share. Consequently, the two companies commenced processes to merge as one strong entity. The two agreed a merger arrangement to benefit from the synergetic efforts.
The two companies intend to form a new entity called Akobolo Ltd (Akobolo).
Required:
i) What is the tax implication of the arrangement if, in the new company-(Akobolo), Akolo intends to hold 40% in the underlying ownership in the assets of the new company while Abolo holds 60%? (3 marks)
View Solution
Under section 47 of Act 2015 (Act 896), the gains on realization of an asset accruing to or derived by a company arising out of a merger, amalgamation or re-organisation of a company is exempt from tax where there is a continuity of at least fifty percent of the underlying ownership in the asset.
The intended merger of the two companies may create either a tax benefit or burden depending on the arrangement.
Under this arrangement, Akolo has 40% in the underlying ownership in the asset of the new company, this suggests realization of the assets and consequently, any gains made is subject to tax by adding it to business income and subjecting it to applicable tax rates.
In the case of Abolo that intends to hold 60% in the underlying ownership in the assets of the new company, any gain from this merger is exempt from tax.
ii) What is the tax implication if both companies hold 50% each in the underlying ownership of the assets of the new company –Akobolo? (2 marks)
View Solution
If both hold 50% in underlying ownership in the assets of the new company that constitutes realization of asset but the gains on this realization are exempt from tax in both Akolo ltd and Abolo ltd.
c) What is the tax implication of the concepts “Trading in Ghana” and “Trading with Ghana” in tax administration arrangement? (3 marks)
View Solution
Trading in Ghana connotes a non-resident person having business presence in Ghana and competing with our local businesses. It implies in simply terms, having a permanent establishment.
On the other hand, trading with Ghana does not connote having presence in Ghana. This will not create any tax implication for the non-resident person.